Azha
New Member
Posts: 16
|
Post by Azha on Apr 27, 2008 17:47:49 GMT
That is impressive.
-- -- --
I think the big bang theory is true as far as our knowledge thus far. Though it could be false. After all, science is only collective ignorance.
|
|
|
Post by Jack on Apr 27, 2008 17:49:25 GMT
That is impressive. -- -- -- I think the big bang theory is true as far as our knowledge thus far. Though it could be false. After all, science is only collective ignorance. Yes, there aren't many alternatives to The Big Bang theory, so assuming science is correct as is or was the big bang.
|
|
Azha
New Member
Posts: 16
|
Post by Azha on Apr 27, 2008 17:51:35 GMT
Oop gotta go for now. Be back later.
|
|
|
Post by Freedomstallion on Apr 27, 2008 17:51:56 GMT
Oh, okay then. ^^ But no, I haven't heard of it. Okay then I guess I'll start, I'm against the Big Bang theory, so I'm guessing you'll take up for? The Big Bang theory is an inplausabile situation for the creation of the universe. To start off, if you look closely at the details of the theory, yo'll notice that it states that the universes came together, exploded, and which created the universe. How can this be possible if the universes were already in existance? How, then, does this theory explain the beginning of the universe? If was obvious that, by how it happened, the universes were already there. ((Okay, well I guess thats good I guess...))
|
|
|
Post by Jack on Apr 27, 2008 17:53:05 GMT
Oop gotta go for now. Be back later. Ok, see you later
|
|
|
Post by Freedomstallion on Apr 27, 2008 17:54:29 GMT
Oop gotta go for now. Be back later. Bye-bye.
|
|
|
Post by Jack on Apr 27, 2008 17:56:27 GMT
Oh, okay then. ^^ But no, I haven't heard of it. Okay then I guess I'll start, I'm against the Big Bang theory, so I'm guessing you'll take up for? The Big Bang theory is an inplausabile situation for the creation of the universe. To start off, if you look closely at the details of the theory, yo'll notice that it states that the universes came together, exploded, and which created the universe. How can this be possible if the universes were already in existance? How, then, does this theory explain the beginning of the universe? If was obvious that, by how it happened, the universes were already there. ((Okay, well I guess thats good I guess...)) There were two distant universes, these two came together and expanding, creating a huge explosion. This then created another completly new universe. There had to be something there in the beginning to create something. You can't make anything out the nothing..
|
|
|
Post by Justine on Apr 27, 2008 18:01:46 GMT
HIIIIIIIII
|
|
|
Post by Justine on Apr 27, 2008 18:02:46 GMT
You really gonna only have one giant thread?
|
|
|
Post by Jack on Apr 27, 2008 18:02:46 GMT
Hi, Welcome to The Big One
|
|
|
Post by Jack on Apr 27, 2008 18:03:18 GMT
You really gonna only have one giant thread? Yes. That's what this forum is all about
|
|
|
Post by Freedomstallion on Apr 27, 2008 18:03:21 GMT
Well, then the Big Bang theory is rather a theory that explains the expanding of the universe then, not the creation. Which is what it's being used to explain. But then if, "Discoveries in astronomy and physics have shown beyond a reasonable doubt that our universe did in fact have a beginning. " Where did those two universes come from. There had to be a beginning according to resources. But, it couldn't have been the Big Bang since that clearly doesn't state the beginning but rather the expansion. Source: www.big-bang-theory.com/
|
|
|
Post by Freedomstallion on Apr 27, 2008 18:04:09 GMT
You really gonna only have one giant thread? Heck yes.
Oh and sorry my reply took so long, in our little debate. I was trying to find a source.
|
|
|
Post by Jack on Apr 27, 2008 18:10:08 GMT
Well, then the Big Bang theory is rather a theory that explains the expanding of the universe then, not the creation. Which is what it's being used to explain. But then if, "Discoveries in astronomy and physics have shown beyond a reasonable doubt that our universe did in fact have a beginning. " Where did those two universes come from. There had to be a beginning according to resources. But, it couldn't have been the Big Bang since that clearly doesn't state the beginning but rather the expansion. Source: www.big-bang-theory.com/For those religious then the answer for them is G-d. I'm expecting you'd then ask, where did God come from. My view is that G-d was created by all the elements combining together and creating the one. My view for the creation in the beginning is the one word "Time". Time is very powerful, yes, you may laugh, but it's a fair point. Time is something that nobody can control, nobody see's, nobody hears. Time is something that is hard to understand. Time created the universe. The big bang then expanded it -- Sorry, I'm sort of making this up I'm pretty pathetic on theories, im not gifted as such in that way. I understand them, however it's hard to contradict and agree with them.
|
|
|
Post by Freedomstallion on Apr 27, 2008 18:13:41 GMT
((That's great, and you sort of stole one of my points. *Is a Christian*))
Well then, that'd be a whole different theory on the creation of the universe. And, if you do believe in God, then you'd believe that He created everything, and that the Big Bang didn't exist.
|
|